eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plFinanseGrupypl.biznes.bankiMI5 Persecution: the BBC, television and radio
Ilość wypowiedzi w tym wątku: 1

  • 1. Data: 2006-11-28 13:39:15
    Temat: MI5 Persecution: the BBC, television and radio
    Od: M...@m...gov.uk

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
    -= the BBC, television and radio -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=

    The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made what seemed
    to be a reaction to something which had happened in my home, and out of
    context of what they were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing
    of the sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a thing could
    occur had not crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt of what had just
    taken place. My disbelief eroded as this recurred time after time. Besides
    the news, offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and
    "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little moral understanding
    among the people who make these programmes; they just assume they will
    never be caught, so they carry on without a thought for the illegality or
    amorality of what they do. The only time I ever heard a word raised in
    doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone else (I think by Clive
    Anderson) back in 1990; referring to the "watching" he said it troubled
    him, and when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well,
    you could just switch it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the
    studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand in the way of continued
    surreptitious spying from his own or other people's shows, though.

    Now you're convinced this is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the
    subject of much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year, and
    some readers believe it to be an invention (it has even been suggested that
    a group of psychology students are responsible!), others think it
    symptomatic of a derangement of the author, and a few give it credence.
    Quite a few people do know part or all of the story already, so this text
    will fill in the gaps in their knowledge. For the rest, what may persuade
    you of the third possibility is that some of the incidents detailed are
    checkable against any archives of radio and TV programmes that exist; that
    the incidents involve named people (even if those hiding in the shadows
    have not made their identity or affiliations evident), and those people
    may be persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign of
    harassment is continuing today both in the UK and on the American
    continent, in a none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant risk
    of exposure increases with time.

    On several occasions people said to my face that harassment from the TV was
    happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the
    local pub with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another
    employee. Ian made a few references to me and said to Phil, as if in an
    aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied, "Yes, I
    think so".

    I made a number of efforts to find the bugs, without success; last year we
    employed professional counter-surveillance people to scan for bugs (see
    later) again without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed of my TV and watched
    virtually no television for the next three years. But harassment from TV
    stations has gone on for over six years and continues to this day. This is
    something that many people obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff
    have the morality of paedophiles, that because they're getting away with it
    they feel no wrong.

    Other people who were involved in the abuse in 1990 were DJs on BBC radio
    stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations (see the
    following section). Again, since they don't have sense in the first place
    they can't be expect to have the moral sense not to be part of criminal
    harassment.

    106


    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

strony : [ 1 ]


Szukaj w grupach

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1