viper wrote:
>
> fatso, wszystkiego naj naj... a w prezencie urodzinowym bajeczka...
> raz ma?y ptaszek jesienia; jak co roku wybra? sie; w podróz. do cieplejszych
> miejsc... ale z.e mu sie; w g?ówce wewne;trzny kompas popieprzy? to miast na
> po?udnie uda? sie; na pó?noc... robi?o sie; coraz zimniej... w kon'cu znuz.ony
> przysiad? na ziemi no i zamarz?... ale przechodzi? tamte;dy renifer i
> przypadkiem zrobi? na niego kupe;... ptaszkowi zrobi?o sie; ciep?o i
> mi?o...szybko odtaja?, podjad? sobie, wystawi? g?ówke; i zacza;? rados'nie
> s'wiergolic... ale niestety przechodzi? nieopodal lis polarny, wycia;gna;? ptaszka
> z kupy, starannie go oczys'ci? i zjad?... ta krótka bajeczka ma az. trzy
> mora?y... nie kaz.dy kto cie; obsrywa jest twoim wrogiem... nie kaz.dy kto cie; z
> gówna wycia;ga jest twoim przyjacielem... i wreszcie mora? najwaz.niejszy...jak
> ci jest dobrze i mi?o to zamknij dziób i siedz' cicho...
> Jeszcze raz wszystkiego najlepszego... zdrowia i w?asnego muzeum sreber...
> oczywis'cie w Otwocku...
>
>
Dzieki za slowa otuchy, Viper.
Wzamian w nagrode dostajesz nizej preview bomby jaka wlasnie rzucilem w
moich wrogow.
Czuje sie jak Wielki Poeta, Zyd oczywiscie, Osip Mandelsztam. Mogl
chicho siedziec i zyc
a on sie zdobyl na prawdziwy wiersz o Stalinie i musial zginac.

Tak i moj okret wlasnie niedlugo zatonie ale ja bede do konca walil ze
wszystkich armat.
Popatrz w jaki sposob przysrywam ludziom z General Medical Council,
szemranej dintojry przed
ktora sie profesorowie w tym kraju trzesa:


*Dr Christopher R Robak*


08/03/2010

To:

Fitness to Practice Directorate

General Medical Council


*Fitness to Practice Panel- invitation to participate in the proceedings*.

Dear Madam,

I am in the receipt of your letter date 22/02/2010 in which you invite
me to participate in the proceedings in my case, as instigated by
Kingston PCT. In particular you invite me to partake

in the tele-conference as a Stage 1 of your deliberations.

Regrettably I have to inform you that I am not prepared to take part in
this freak show as I am neither an Elephant Man nor a Woman with Three
Breasts, thus unworthy of your amusement.

Besides I have come to the opinion after two previous encounters in
person with the Panel of General Medical Council that the result of your
forthcoming proceedings is a foregone conclusion and that I cannot hope
to obtain justice in this country.

I invite you to draw upon my statement to the GMC panel as expressed in
person in November 2009. If memory serves me well I did:

ˇ Express my outrage at Kingston PCT and Local Care Direct of West
Yorkshire at trampling upon my basic human right by wilfully misleading
me as to the cause of death of the patient, Mrs F., the cause of my
initial suspension.

ˇ Express my outrage at lies and distortions as presented by Kingston
PCT in my case. I believe my advice to Mrs F. on the fateful night,
albeit based on the mistaken diagnosis and inadequate examination, could
be perfectly acceptable in different circumstances. To present me as
ignoramus in those circumstances was an act of foul betrayal by a fellow
professional, one Dr ... for Kingston PCT.

ˇ Inform the GMC Panel of my impeccable service record as registered
medical practitioner

in this country since 1975. Informed GMC Panel(which they knew already
from their investigations) that I have had nothing but letters of praise
from two employing me agencies and the complaints made to Local Care
Direct were vigorously contested in timely and exhaustive manner. In one
trivial case I have had to apologise, in others I stood my ground and
indeed, I am proud of my actions as a general practitioner. In the case
of death of Mrs F. I have provided immediately an unsolicited full
deposition by which I stand.

ˇ Express my outrage at the vindictive nature of the terms of GMC
suspension. I have volunteered to restrain my medical practice to work
for private establishment in Surrey,

a diet clinic for whom I did work for the last 20 years. GMC Panel in
June 2008 in their wisdom decreed that I have to be suspended as "danger
to patients and myself" and did not change their view in spite of my
employers sending begging letters on my behalf.

ˇ In view of the above I have demanded of General Medical Council during
their November hearing to put on the table firm evidence that I have
ever harmed a patient in this country, by any act of commission or
omission. Lawyers for the GMC failed to do so.

ˇ I have invited two medically qualified members of the GMC Panel during
June 2008 hearing to comment upon the cause of death of Mrs F., the
reason for my initial suspension.

You will note that both declined, and rightly so as I have proved to
them, quotation in hand that I could not possibly be blamed for her
death. The cretinous answer of the Chairman of the Panel was, at the
time: Doctor, which textbook you quote from? I put him down giving the
answer seemingly quite above his station.

Dear Madam, the question of my health arises in your letter. I have
provided again and again, evidence of my general practitioner that I am
no pray to substance abuse. You are welcome to enquire, however often
you want. I have no psychiatric record either but kindly refer to my
deposition last November, a copy of my Appeal to the Lord Chief Justice
in which I did volunteer to undergo psychiatric examination for forensic
reasons only should it be required. I do remain happily married and do
sleep well.

I appreciate fully that your employers, General Medical Council, so bent
on my ultimate destruction but at the same time lacking in any decent
hard evidence against me, will be disappointed. Any evidence in my
favour to-date studiously ignored, they intended to sit salivating like
Pavlovian dogs, hoping to catch a morsel of self incrimination from me.

Well, it is not to be exept for the above letter, of course.

. Do your damnest and be done with.

Yours sincerely

K R Robak

Copy to: Mr Jonathan Ungoed-Thomas, Senior News reporter, The Sunday Times